2005 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1984 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2005 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Wrangler (190 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 1984 Mitsubishi Colt. (70 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1984 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 2005 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Mitsubishi Colt. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 217 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Mitsubishi Colt. (102 Nm). This means 2005 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Jeep Wrangler | 1984 Mitsubishi Colt | |
| Make | Jeep | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Wrangler | Colt |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1984 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3966 cc | 1437 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 70 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 319 Nm | 102 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4120 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2390 mm |
