2005 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1989 Suzuki Alto
To start off, 2005 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Suzuki Alto. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Suzuki Alto would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Wrangler (190 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 152 more horse power than 1989 Suzuki Alto. (38 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1989 Suzuki Alto.
Because 2005 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 Suzuki Alto. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 260 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Suzuki Alto. (59 Nm). This means 2005 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Suzuki Alto.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jeep Wrangler | 1989 Suzuki Alto | |
Make | Jeep | Suzuki |
Model | Wrangler | Alto |
Year Released | 2005 | 1989 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3966 cc | 796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 59 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 99 mm | 68.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 3310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1410 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2180 mm |