2005 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1994 Opel Omega
To start off, 2005 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Opel Omega would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Wrangler (191 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1994 Opel Omega. (129 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1994 Opel Omega.
Because 2005 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1994 Opel Omega. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Opel Omega. (250 Nm). This means 2005 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Opel Omega.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Jeep Wrangler | 1994 Opel Omega | |
| Make | Jeep | Opel |
| Model | Wrangler | Omega |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3966 cc | 2498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 191 HP | 129 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 319 Nm | 250 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2740 mm |
