2005 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1996 Mazda MPV
To start off, 2005 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda MPV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda MPV would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Wrangler (190 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1996 Mazda MPV. (114 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1996 Mazda MPV.
Because 2005 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Mazda MPV. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda MPV. (277 Nm). This means 2005 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda MPV.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Jeep Wrangler | 1996 Mazda MPV | |
| Make | Jeep | Mazda |
| Model | Wrangler | MPV |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1996 |
| Body Type | SUV | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3966 cc | 2498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 114 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Torque | 319 Nm | 277 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2850 mm |
