2005 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1998 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2005 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Wrangler (191 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1998 Mitsubishi Colt. (74 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1998 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 2005 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Mitsubishi Colt. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 210 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Mitsubishi Colt. (109 Nm). This means 2005 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jeep Wrangler | 1998 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Jeep | Mitsubishi |
Model | Wrangler | Colt |
Year Released | 2005 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3966 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 191 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 109 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2430 mm |