2005 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2000 ZAZ Wagon
To start off, 2005 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 ZAZ Wagon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 ZAZ Wagon would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Wrangler (191 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 2000 ZAZ Wagon. (51 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 2000 ZAZ Wagon.
Because 2005 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 ZAZ Wagon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 240 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 ZAZ Wagon. (79 Nm). This means 2005 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 ZAZ Wagon.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Jeep Wrangler | 2000 ZAZ Wagon | |
| Make | Jeep | ZAZ |
| Model | Wrangler | Wagon |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3966 cc | 1091 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 191 HP | 51 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque | 319 Nm | 79 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 99 mm | 72 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 67 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 3830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2330 mm |
