2005 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2001 Lincoln LS
To start off, 2005 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Lincoln LS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Lincoln LS would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Lincoln LS (252 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 2005 Jeep Wrangler. (191 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 2005 Jeep Wrangler.
Because 2005 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Lincoln LS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Lincoln LS (362 Nm) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Jeep Wrangler. (319 Nm). This means 2001 Lincoln LS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jeep Wrangler | 2001 Lincoln LS | |
Make | Jeep | Lincoln |
Model | Wrangler | LS |
Year Released | 2005 | 2001 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3966 cc | 3950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 191 HP | 252 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 362 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 99 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 10.6:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2910 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 68 L |