2005 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2002 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2005 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jeep Compass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jeep Compass would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jeep Compass (210 HP) has 69 more horse power than 2005 Jeep Wrangler. (141 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 2005 Jeep Wrangler. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 45 kg more than 2002 Jeep Compass.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jeep Compass (319 Nm) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Jeep Wrangler. (224 Nm). This means 2002 Jeep Compass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jeep Wrangler | 2002 Jeep Compass | |
Make | Jeep | Jeep |
Model | Wrangler | Compass |
Year Released | 2005 | 2002 |
Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2425 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 210 HP |
Torque | 224 Nm | 319 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1451 kg | 1406 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2660 mm |