2005 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2003 Mazda 6
To start off, 2005 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Wrangler (190 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 6. (104 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 6.
Because 2005 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Mazda 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda 6. (240 Nm). This means 2005 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jeep Wrangler | 2003 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Jeep | Mazda |
Model | Wrangler | 6 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2003 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3966 cc | 1594 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2610 mm |