2005 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2003 MG TF
To start off, 2005 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 MG TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 MG TF would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Wrangler (191 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 2003 MG TF. (158 HP @ 6900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 2003 MG TF.
Because 2005 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 MG TF. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MG TF. (174 Nm). This means 2005 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MG TF.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jeep Wrangler | 2003 MG TF | |
Make | Jeep | MG |
Model | Wrangler | TF |
Year Released | 2005 | 2003 |
Body Type | SUV | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3966 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 191 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6900 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 174 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 99 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 89.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 50 L |