2005 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2004 MG ZT
To start off, 2005 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 MG ZT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 MG ZT would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Wrangler (190 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2004 MG ZT. (175 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 2004 MG ZT.
Because 2005 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 MG ZT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 MG ZT. (240 Nm). This means 2005 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 MG ZT.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jeep Wrangler | 2004 MG ZT | |
Make | Jeep | MG |
Model | Wrangler | ZT |
Year Released | 2005 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3966 cc | 2495 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 175 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 240 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 99 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 82.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 10.3:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 65 L |