2005 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2006 Rover 75
To start off, 2006 Rover 75 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Wrangler (191 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 2006 Rover 75. (148 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 2006 Rover 75.
Because 2005 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Rover 75. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Rover 75. (215 Nm). This means 2005 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Jeep Wrangler | 2006 Rover 75 | |
| Make | Jeep | Rover |
| Model | Wrangler | 75 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3966 cc | 1796 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 191 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 319 Nm | 215 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 99 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 89.3 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 9.2:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2760 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 65 L |
