2005 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2008 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2008 Holden Commodore is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 219 more horse power than 2005 Jeep Wrangler. (141 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2005 Jeep Wrangler.
Because 2005 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Holden Commodore. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Jeep Wrangler. (224 Nm). This means 2008 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jeep Wrangler | 2008 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Jeep | Holden |
Model | Wrangler | Commodore |
Year Released | 2005 | 2008 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2425 cc | 5976 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 360 HP |
Torque | 224 Nm | 290 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 14.4 L/100km |