2005 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2009 Renault Trafic
To start off, 2009 Renault Trafic is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Wrangler (190 HP) has 90 more horse power than 2009 Renault Trafic. (100 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 2009 Renault Trafic.
Because 2005 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Renault Trafic. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Renault Trafic. (241 Nm). This means 2005 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Renault Trafic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jeep Wrangler | 2009 Renault Trafic | |
Make | Jeep | Renault |
Model | Wrangler | Trafic |
Year Released | 2005 | 2009 |
Body Type | SUV | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3966 cc | 1870 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 100 HP |
Torque | 319 Nm | 241 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 9 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 3100 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 90 L |