2005 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2010 Chrysler 300
To start off, 2010 Chrysler 300 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chrysler 300 (360 HP @ 5150 RPM) has 170 more horse power than 2005 Jeep Wrangler. (190 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 2005 Jeep Wrangler.
Because 2005 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Chrysler 300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Chrysler 300 (527 Nm) has 208 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Jeep Wrangler. (319 Nm). This means 2010 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jeep Wrangler | 2010 Chrysler 300 | |
Make | Jeep | Chrysler |
Model | Wrangler | 300 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3966 cc | 5700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 360 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5150 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 527 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4999 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1882 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1483 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 3048 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 72 L |