2005 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2010 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2010 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mitsubishi Outlander (230 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2005 Jeep Wrangler. (190 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 2005 Jeep Wrangler.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Mitsubishi Outlander. (291 Nm). This means 2005 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jeep Wrangler | 2010 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
Make | Jeep | Mitsubishi |
Model | Wrangler | Outlander |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3966 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 230 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 291 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4666 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1801 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 60 L |