2005 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2010 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2010 Nissan Pixo is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Wrangler (175 HP) has 107 more horse power than 2010 Nissan Pixo. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 2010 Nissan Pixo.
Because 2005 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Nissan Pixo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jeep Wrangler | 2010 Nissan Pixo | |
Make | Jeep | Nissan |
Model | Wrangler | Pixo |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3960 cc | 996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 68 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 174 km/hour | 155 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 9.4 seconds | 13.5 seconds |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 3580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2360 mm |