2005 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2012 Audi RS3
To start off, 2012 Audi RS3 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi RS3 (335 HP) has 160 more horse power than 2005 Jeep Wrangler. (175 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi RS3 should accelerate faster than 2005 Jeep Wrangler.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi RS3 (450 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 154 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Jeep Wrangler. (296 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2012 Audi RS3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Jeep Wrangler. 2012 Audi RS3 has automatic transmission and 2005 Jeep Wrangler has manual transmission. 2005 Jeep Wrangler will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Audi RS3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jeep Wrangler | 2012 Audi RS3 | |
Make | Jeep | Audi |
Model | Wrangler | RS3 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3960 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 335 HP |
Torque | 296 Nm | 450 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 174 km/hour | 250 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 9.4 seconds | 4.6 seconds |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 7-speed automated manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |