2005 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS (266 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 2005 Jeep Wrangler. (190 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2005 Jeep Wrangler.
Because 2005 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Cadillac CTS. (302 Nm). This means 2005 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Cadillac CTS.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jeep Wrangler | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Jeep | Cadillac |
Model | Wrangler | CTS |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3966 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 266 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 302 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 99 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 11.7 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4877 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1473 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 68 L |