2005 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2013 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XF is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 5,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XF (464 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 274 more horse power than 2005 Jeep Wrangler. (190 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 2005 Jeep Wrangler.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jaguar XF (450 Nm) has 131 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Jeep Wrangler. (319 Nm). This means 2013 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jeep Wrangler | 2013 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Jeep | Jaguar |
Model | Wrangler | XF |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3966 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 464 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 450 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 99 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2053 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2909 mm |