2005 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo
To start off, 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo weights approximately 49 kg more than 2005 Jeep Wrangler.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo (540 Nm) has 316 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Jeep Wrangler. (224 Nm). This means 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Jeep Wrangler | 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo | |
| Make | Jeep | Lamborghini |
| Model | Wrangler | Gallardo |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 141 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 8000 RPM |
| Torque | 224 Nm | 540 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 101 mm | 92 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1451 kg | 1500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4345 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1165 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2560 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 11.2 L/100km | 11.5 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 18.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 90 L |
