2005 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2013 Volvo X670
To start off, 2013 Volvo X670 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo X670 (296 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 2005 Jeep Wrangler. (191 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo X670 should accelerate faster than 2005 Jeep Wrangler.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Volvo X670 (441 Nm) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Jeep Wrangler. (319 Nm). This means 2013 Volvo X670 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jeep Wrangler | 2013 Volvo X670 | |
Make | Jeep | Volvo |
Model | Wrangler | X670 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3966 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 6 valves |
Horse Power | 191 HP | 296 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 441 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 99 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 93 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4838 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1604 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2815 mm |