2005 Kia Carnival vs. 1940 Alfa Romeo 6C
To start off, 2005 Kia Carnival is newer by 65 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1940 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1940 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,902 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Kia Carnival is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Kia Carnival (143 HP @ 8800 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1940 Alfa Romeo 6C. (89 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Kia Carnival should accelerate faster than 1940 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Because 1940 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1940 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Kia Carnival, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Kia Carnival | 1940 Alfa Romeo 6C | |
Make | Kia | Alfa Romeo |
Model | Carnival | 6C |
Year Released | 2005 | 1940 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2902 cc | 2442 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 8800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 97.1 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98 mm | 100 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 77 L |