2005 Kia Carnival vs. 1952 Riley RM A
To start off, 2005 Kia Carnival is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Riley RM A would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Kia Carnival is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia Carnival weights approximately 753 kg more than 1952 Riley RM A.
Because 1952 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Kia Carnival, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Kia Carnival | 1952 Riley RM A | |
| Make | Kia | Riley |
| Model | Carnival | RM A |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1952 |
| Engine Size | 2497 cc | 1496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1988 kg | 1235 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2870 mm |
