2005 Kia Carnival vs. 1978 Volvo 66
To start off, 2005 Kia Carnival is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 2,902 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Kia Carnival is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Kia Carnival (143 HP @ 8800 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1978 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Kia Carnival should accelerate faster than 1978 Volvo 66.
Because 1978 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Kia Carnival, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Kia Carnival (310 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 216 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Volvo 66. (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2005 Kia Carnival will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Kia Carnival | 1978 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Kia | Volvo |
Model | Carnival | 66 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2902 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 8800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 310 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 19.0:1 | 8.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1550 mm |