2005 Kia Carnival vs. 1994 Lancia Zeta
To start off, 2005 Kia Carnival is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Lancia Zeta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Lancia Zeta would be higher. At 2,902 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Kia Carnival is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Kia Carnival (137 HP @ 8800 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1994 Lancia Zeta. (89 HP @ 4100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Kia Carnival should accelerate faster than 1994 Lancia Zeta.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Kia Carnival (310 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 128 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Lancia Zeta. (182 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2005 Kia Carnival will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Lancia Zeta. 1994 Lancia Zeta has automatic transmission and 2005 Kia Carnival has manual transmission. 2005 Kia Carnival will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1994 Lancia Zeta will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Kia Carnival | 1994 Lancia Zeta | |
Make | Kia | Lancia |
Model | Carnival | Zeta |
Year Released | 2005 | 1994 |
Body Type | Minivan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2902 cc | 1929 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 8800 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Torque | 310 Nm | 182 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Top Speed | 169 km/hour | 195 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |