2005 Kia Carnival vs. 1994 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 2005 Kia Carnival is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Kia Carnival is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO (197 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 2005 Kia Carnival. (148 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia Carnival.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Kia Carnival | 1994 Mitsubishi FTO | |
| Make | Kia | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Carnival | FTO |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1994 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2497 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 7500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 14.5 seconds | 6.5 seconds |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2510 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.9 L/100km | 10 L/100km |
