2005 Kia Carnival vs. 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR
To start off, 2005 Kia Carnival is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR would be higher. At 4,996 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia Carnival weights approximately 500 kg more than 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR.
Because 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Kia Carnival, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Kia Carnival | 2000 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR | |
Make | Kia | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Carnival | CLK GTR |
Year Released | 2005 | 2000 |
Body Type | Minivan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2902 cc | 4996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1110 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2680 mm |