2005 Kia Carnival vs. 2000 Mercury Sable

To start off, 2005 Kia Carnival is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mercury Sable. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mercury Sable would be higher. At 3,001 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia Carnival weights approximately 509 kg more than 2000 Mercury Sable.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mercury Sable (248 Nm) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia Carnival. (224 Nm). This means 2000 Mercury Sable will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia Carnival. 2000 Mercury Sable has automatic transmission and 2005 Kia Carnival has manual transmission. 2005 Kia Carnival will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Mercury Sable will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Kia Carnival 2000 Mercury Sable
Make Kia Mercury
Model Carnival Sable
Year Released 2005 2000
Body Type Minivan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2497 cc 3001 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 148 HP 0 HP
Torque 224 Nm 248 Nm
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 7 seats 6 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 2083 kg 1574 kg
Vehicle Length 4930 mm 5100 mm
Vehicle Width 1910 mm 1860 mm
Vehicle Height 1740 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2910 mm 2760 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 75 L 68 L