2005 Kia Carnival vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Raider
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Kia Carnival. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Kia Carnival would be higher. At 4,703 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Mitsubishi Raider is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider (230 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 2005 Kia Carnival. (142 HP @ 8800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia Carnival.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider (393 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia Carnival. (310 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2006 Mitsubishi Raider will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia Carnival.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Kia Carnival | 2006 Mitsubishi Raider | |
Make | Kia | Mitsubishi |
Model | Carnival | Raider |
Year Released | 2005 | 2006 |
Body Type | Minivan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2901 cc | 4703 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 142 HP | 230 HP |
Engine RPM | 8800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 310 Nm | 393 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 5590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 3340 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.2 L/100km | 14 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 83 L |