2005 Kia K2700 vs. 1951 Singer SM 1500
To start off, 2005 Kia K2700 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Singer SM 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Singer SM 1500 would be higher. At 2,665 cc, 2005 Kia K2700 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Kia K2700 (83 HP @ 4150 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1951 Singer SM 1500. (47 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Kia K2700 should accelerate faster than 1951 Singer SM 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia K2700 weights approximately 690 kg more than 1951 Singer SM 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Kia K2700 (176 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Singer SM 1500. (98 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2005 Kia K2700 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Singer SM 1500.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Kia K2700 | 1951 Singer SM 1500 | |
Make | Kia | Singer |
Model | K2700 | SM 1500 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1951 |
Engine Size | 2665 cc | 1495 cc |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 4150 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 98 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 94.5 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95 mm | 89.4 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 840 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2320 mm |