2005 Kia K2700 vs. 1964 Toyota Corona
To start off, 2005 Kia K2700 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Toyota Corona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Toyota Corona would be higher. At 2,665 cc, 2005 Kia K2700 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 83 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia K2700 weights approximately 560 kg more than 1964 Toyota Corona.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Kia K2700 (175 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Toyota Corona. (118 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2005 Kia K2700 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Toyota Corona.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Kia K2700 | 1964 Toyota Corona | |
Make | Kia | Toyota |
Model | K2700 | Corona |
Year Released | 2005 | 1964 |
Engine Size | 2665 cc | 1453 cc |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 4150 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 118 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 94.5 mm | 77.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95 mm | 77 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 970 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 61 L |