2005 Kia K2700 vs. 1971 Matra-Simca M530
To start off, 2005 Kia K2700 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Matra-Simca M530. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Matra-Simca M530 would be higher. At 2,665 cc, 2005 Kia K2700 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Kia K2700 (83 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1971 Matra-Simca M530. (71 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Kia K2700 should accelerate faster than 1971 Matra-Simca M530. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia K2700 weights approximately 595 kg more than 1971 Matra-Simca M530. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Kia K2700 (175 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Matra-Simca M530. (128 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2005 Kia K2700 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Matra-Simca M530.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Kia K2700 | 1971 Matra-Simca M530 | |
Make | Kia | Matra-Simca |
Model | K2700 | M530 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1971 |
Engine Size | 2665 cc | 1699 cc |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 71 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 128 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 935 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2570 mm |