2005 Kia K2700 vs. 1971 Rover 2000
To start off, 2005 Kia K2700 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Rover 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Rover 2000 would be higher. At 2,665 cc, 2005 Kia K2700 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 Rover 2000 (106 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2005 Kia K2700. (83 HP @ 4150 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1971 Rover 2000 should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia K2700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia K2700 weights approximately 235 kg more than 1971 Rover 2000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Kia K2700 (175 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Rover 2000. (172 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2005 Kia K2700 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Rover 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Kia K2700 | 1971 Rover 2000 | |
| Make | Kia | Rover |
| Model | K2700 | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1971 |
| Engine Size | 2665 cc | 1978 cc |
| Horse Power | 83 HP | 106 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4150 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 175 Nm | 172 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3750 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1295 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2640 mm |
