2005 Kia K2700 vs. 1976 Renault Siete
To start off, 2005 Kia K2700 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Renault Siete. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Renault Siete would be higher. At 2,665 cc, 2005 Kia K2700 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Kia K2700 (83 HP @ 4150 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1976 Renault Siete. (49 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Kia K2700 should accelerate faster than 1976 Renault Siete. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia K2700 weights approximately 715 kg more than 1976 Renault Siete. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Kia K2700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Kia K2700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Renault Siete, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Kia K2700 (176 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Renault Siete. (73 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Kia K2700 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Renault Siete.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Kia K2700 | 1976 Renault Siete | |
Make | Kia | Renault |
Model | K2700 | Siete |
Year Released | 2005 | 1976 |
Engine Size | 2665 cc | 1037 cc |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 4150 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 73 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 815 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2540 mm |