2005 Kia K2700 vs. 1979 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 2005 Kia K2700 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,665 cc, 2005 Kia K2700 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Mazda RX-2 (118 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 2005 Kia K2700. (83 HP @ 4150 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1979 Mazda RX-2 should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia K2700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia K2700 weights approximately 570 kg more than 1979 Mazda RX-2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Kia K2700 (175 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Mazda RX-2. (158 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2005 Kia K2700 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Kia K2700 | 1979 Mazda RX-2 | |
Make | Kia | Mazda |
Model | K2700 | RX-2 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1979 |
Engine Size | 2665 cc | 2292 cc |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4150 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 960 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2480 mm |