2005 Kia K2700 vs. 1981 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2005 Kia K2700 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 2,665 cc, 2005 Kia K2700 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Mazda Cosmo (102 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 2005 Kia K2700. (83 HP @ 4150 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1981 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia K2700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia K2700 weights approximately 432 kg more than 1981 Mazda Cosmo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Kia K2700 (175 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Mazda Cosmo. (167 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 2005 Kia K2700 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Kia K2700 | 1981 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Kia | Mazda |
Model | K2700 | Cosmo |
Year Released | 2005 | 1981 |
Engine Size | 2665 cc | 1970 cc |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 4150 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 167 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3300 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 94.5 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95 mm | 98 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1098 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2620 mm |