2005 Kia K2700 vs. 1987 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2005 Kia K2700 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 2,665 cc, 2005 Kia K2700 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Kia K2700 (83 HP @ 4150 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1987 Mitsubishi Colt. (57 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Kia K2700 should accelerate faster than 1987 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia K2700 weights approximately 594 kg more than 1987 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Kia K2700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Kia K2700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Kia K2700 (175 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Mitsubishi Colt. (108 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2005 Kia K2700 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Kia K2700 | 1987 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Kia | Mitsubishi |
Model | K2700 | Colt |
Year Released | 2005 | 1987 |
Engine Size | 2665 cc | 1795 cc |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 57 HP |
Engine RPM | 4150 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 108 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 936 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2390 mm |