2005 Kia K2700 vs. 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2005 Kia K2700 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,665 cc, 2005 Kia K2700 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass (163 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 2005 Kia K2700. (83 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia K2700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia K2700 weights approximately 330 kg more than 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2005 Kia K2700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Kia K2700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass (237 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia K2700. (175 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia K2700.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Kia K2700 | 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Kia | Oldsmobile |
| Model | K2700 | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1990 |
| Engine Size | 2665 cc | 1998 cc |
| Horse Power | 83 HP | 163 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 175 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1200 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2640 mm |
