2005 Kia K2700 vs. 1993 Renault Clio

To start off, 2005 Kia K2700 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Renault Clio would be higher. At 2,665 cc, 2005 Kia K2700 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Kia K2700 (83 HP @ 4150 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1993 Renault Clio. (72 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Kia K2700 should accelerate faster than 1993 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia K2700 weights approximately 630 kg more than 1993 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2005 Kia K2700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Kia K2700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Kia K2700 (175 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Renault Clio. (107 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2005 Kia K2700 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Renault Clio. 1993 Renault Clio has automatic transmission and 2005 Kia K2700 has manual transmission. 2005 Kia K2700 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1993 Renault Clio will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: