2005 Kia K2700 vs. 1995 Lotus Elan
To start off, 2005 Kia K2700 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 2,665 cc, 2005 Kia K2700 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Lotus Elan (163 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 2005 Kia K2700. (83 HP @ 4150 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia K2700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia K2700 weights approximately 510 kg more than 1995 Lotus Elan.
Because 2005 Kia K2700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Kia K2700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Lotus Elan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Lotus Elan (204 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia K2700. (175 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1995 Lotus Elan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia K2700.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Kia K2700 | 1995 Lotus Elan | |
| Make | Kia | Lotus |
| Model | K2700 | Elan |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1995 |
| Engine Size | 2665 cc | 1588 cc |
| Horse Power | 83 HP | 163 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4150 RPM | 6600 RPM |
| Torque | 175 Nm | 204 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1020 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2260 mm |
