2005 Kia K2700 vs. 1995 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2005 Kia K2700 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,665 cc, 2005 Kia K2700 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Toyota Celica (114 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 2005 Kia K2700. (83 HP @ 4150 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia K2700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia K2700 weights approximately 435 kg more than 1995 Toyota Celica.
Because 2005 Kia K2700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Kia K2700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Toyota Celica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Kia K2700 (175 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Toyota Celica. (154 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2005 Kia K2700 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Kia K2700 | 1995 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Kia | Toyota |
Model | K2700 | Celica |
Year Released | 2005 | 1995 |
Engine Size | 2665 cc | 1762 cc |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 4150 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 154 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 94.5 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95 mm | 78 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1095 kg |