2005 Kia K2700 vs. 1996 Lancia Zeta

To start off, 2005 Kia K2700 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Lancia Zeta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Lancia Zeta would be higher. At 2,665 cc, 2005 Kia K2700 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Lancia Zeta (109 HP @ 4300 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 2005 Kia K2700. (83 HP @ 4150 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Lancia Zeta should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia K2700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Lancia Zeta weights approximately 85 kg more than 2005 Kia K2700. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2005 Kia K2700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Kia K2700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Lancia Zeta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Lancia Zeta (260 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia K2700. (175 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1996 Lancia Zeta will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia K2700.

Compare all specifications: