2005 Kia K2700 vs. 1996 Mazda 626
To start off, 2005 Kia K2700 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 2,665 cc, 2005 Kia K2700 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mazda 626 (104 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 2005 Kia K2700. (83 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia K2700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia K2700 weights approximately 390 kg more than 1996 Mazda 626.
Because 2005 Kia K2700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Kia K2700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mazda 626, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Kia K2700 (175 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda 626. (149 Nm @ 4300 RPM). This means 2005 Kia K2700 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Kia K2700 | 1996 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Kia | Mazda |
Model | K2700 | 626 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1996 |
Engine Size | 2665 cc | 1840 cc |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 149 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 94.5 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95 mm | 88 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1140 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2620 mm |