2005 Kia K2700 vs. 1998 Lada Niva
To start off, 2005 Kia K2700 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Lada Niva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Lada Niva would be higher. At 2,665 cc, 2005 Kia K2700 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Kia K2700 (83 HP @ 4150 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1998 Lada Niva. (79 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Kia K2700 should accelerate faster than 1998 Lada Niva. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia K2700 weights approximately 320 kg more than 1998 Lada Niva. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1998 Lada Niva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Kia K2700. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Lada Niva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Kia K2700 (176 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Lada Niva. (133 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2005 Kia K2700 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Lada Niva.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Kia K2700 | 1998 Lada Niva | |
| Make | Kia | Lada |
| Model | K2700 | Niva |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1998 |
| Engine Size | 2665 cc | 1689 cc |
| Horse Power | 83 HP | 79 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4150 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 176 Nm | 133 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 94.5 mm | 82 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 95 mm | 80 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1210 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2210 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 42 L |
