2005 Kia K2700 vs. 1999 Renault Scenic

To start off, 2005 Kia K2700 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Renault Scenic. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Renault Scenic would be higher. At 2,665 cc, 2005 Kia K2700 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Renault Scenic (136 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 2005 Kia K2700. (83 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Renault Scenic should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia K2700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia K2700 weights approximately 135 kg more than 1999 Renault Scenic.

Because 2005 Kia K2700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Kia K2700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Renault Scenic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Renault Scenic (188 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia K2700. (175 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1999 Renault Scenic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia K2700. 1999 Renault Scenic has automatic transmission and 2005 Kia K2700 has manual transmission. 2005 Kia K2700 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Renault Scenic will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: