2005 Kia K2700 vs. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU

To start off, 2005 Kia K2700 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mitsubishi SSU would be higher. At 2,665 cc, 2005 Kia K2700 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU (119 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 2005 Kia K2700. (83 HP @ 4150 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia K2700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU weights approximately 375 kg more than 2005 Kia K2700. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2000 Mitsubishi SSU is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Kia K2700. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mitsubishi SSU (240 Nm) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia K2700. (175 Nm). This means 2000 Mitsubishi SSU will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia K2700. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU has automatic transmission and 2005 Kia K2700 has manual transmission. 2005 Kia K2700 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: