2005 Kia K2700 vs. 2002 BMW Z3

To start off, 2005 Kia K2700 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 BMW Z3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 BMW Z3 would be higher. At 2,996 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 BMW Z3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW Z3 (228 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 145 more horse power than 2005 Kia K2700. (83 HP @ 4150 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW Z3 should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia K2700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia K2700 weights approximately 130 kg more than 2002 BMW Z3.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW Z3 (301 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 125 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia K2700. (176 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2002 BMW Z3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia K2700. 2002 BMW Z3 has automatic transmission and 2005 Kia K2700 has manual transmission. 2005 Kia K2700 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 BMW Z3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: