2005 Kia K2700 vs. 2003 Proton 400
To start off, 2005 Kia K2700 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Proton 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Proton 400 would be higher. At 2,665 cc, 2005 Kia K2700 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Kia K2700 (83 HP @ 4150 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2003 Proton 400. (74 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Kia K2700 should accelerate faster than 2003 Proton 400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia K2700 weights approximately 560 kg more than 2003 Proton 400. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Kia K2700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Kia K2700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Proton 400, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Kia K2700 (175 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Proton 400. (108 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Kia K2700 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Proton 400.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Kia K2700 | 2003 Proton 400 | |
Make | Kia | Proton |
Model | K2700 | 400 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2003 |
Engine Size | 2665 cc | 1299 cc |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 4150 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 108 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 970 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2510 mm |