2005 Kia K2700 vs. 2003 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2005 Kia K2700 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Toyota Condor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Toyota Condor would be higher. At 2,665 cc, 2005 Kia K2700 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Toyota Condor (108 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2005 Kia K2700. (83 HP @ 4150 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Condor should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia K2700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia K2700 weights approximately 25 kg more than 2003 Toyota Condor.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Toyota Condor (192 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia K2700. (176 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2003 Toyota Condor will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia K2700.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Kia K2700 | 2003 Toyota Condor | |
| Make | Kia | Toyota |
| Model | K2700 | Condor |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2003 |
| Engine Size | 2665 cc | 2437 cc |
| Horse Power | 83 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4150 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 176 Nm | 192 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 94.5 mm | 95 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 95 mm | 86 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1505 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2640 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 70 L |
